Power Case Study

Multi-ERP vendor duplication was hiding working capital.

Inconsistent master data quality and delayed AP aging reports compressed executive decision windows by 30%-40%.

The situation

What they needed to solve

Resolve vendor duplication across multiple ERPs
Working capital friction across operations
Restore executive decision windows
Delayed AP aging reports compressed decision windows by 30%-40%
Fix master data quality blocking automation
Location data on fewer than 0.1% of customer records, credit-control fields 0% populated
What the Super Audit found

$17M in savings opportunities identified

The Super Audit evaluated ~7,600 vendor records across ERPs and found ~1,300 duplicate vendor entities. Severe data quality gaps blocked automation: location data on fewer than 0.1% of customer records, and credit-control fields 0% populated.

Vendor Master Rationalization

$3M-$7M
  • ~1,300 duplicate vendor entities across ERPs
  • 10%-15% of vendor spend immediately capturable

AP Workflow Modernization

$2M-$5M
  • AP aging data arrived 1.5 days late each week, compressing decision windows by 30%-40%
  • Manual line-item GL coding and invoice parsing

Inventory & Working Capital

$4M-$10M
  • Operations held more inventory than they needed
Results

What the CFO could approve now

$5M-$12M in direct CFO-authority savings quantified
Across AP and Procurement
$4M-$10M in inventory flagged as a longer-term opportunity
Excess inventory held across operations
No system changes required
All findings from existing data.

See what the Super Audit can find for you.

30 days from kickoff to board-ready findings. Your data. No lengthy implementation.